Swirling by Christelyn Karazin

The art of attraction isn't just about colour or creed, it's about chemistry and a whole bunch of other things. Swirling author Christelyn Karazon discusses.

Watch: Is "Pink Peen" Aversion a Real Thing When it Comes to Interracial Dating?!

Posted by Christelyn, 07 Oct 16

Good golly molly. They list of creative excuses black women come up with for the reasons why they can’t date interracially is endless. Add to the list now is the aversion to “pink peen” or pink penis.

Seriously, ladies? Is that the true measure of a man these days to black women? Relationships are all about sex with deeply mellanated members–not about picking quality mates based on character, compatibility, shared values and goals? Are the expectations for partners so low now that any of the above qualifiers are just too much to ask?!

The real issue going unaddressed is that the bar for “quality” has gotten so low for black women that the gauge for a suitable person in a relationship is based on looks and dick size. Conversely, the quality of a black woman is often measured by her lightness, ass size, and hair grade. My god…and these two together making babies is why the collective IQ of humanity is plummeting.

Your perfect partner could be online right now...

What are you looking for?

Here’s some more thoughts on the subject…

Christelyn Karazin is the co-author of Swirling: How to Date, Mate and Relate, Mixing Race, Culture and Creed. She also operates the popular blog, Beyond Black & White, and operate the first forum dedicated to black women interested and/or involved in interracial relationships.

2 responses to "Watch: Is "Pink Peen" Aversion a Real Thing When it Comes to Interracial Dating?!"

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  1.   Sassy3226 says:
    Posted: 07 Feb

    When are we going to stop believing these old wives tales..? The size of a man has nothing to do with the color of his skin...Trust me I've seen blk men with hitchhiker peens....LOL !!

    Like or Dislike: or 0 (0)
    Reply to this comment